This article is reprinted from the A.T. Quarterly, Volume 3, Number 1 (1992)
Here are two strategies for tracking and promoting assistive technology
systems change efforts around funding access concerns in your state.
Assistive Technology Systems Change Action Step Quiz
The following questions concern 11 specific AT action steps which advocates can take to
foster increased access to assistive technology in your state. Take the quiz yourself and get
others to do so as well. Make a list of those steps that have already been done and indicate any
follow up actions that need to be carried out. Add these to your state systems change projectþs
collective "to do" list. Add to the top of that "to do" list any of the 11 steps that have never
been completed. Make it a priority to complete them and, "Just do it!"
1. Do you know who is the lead agency in your state for implementation of the federal early
intervention Part H mandate? 2. Have you met with the state director to discuss planning for enhanced technology access
for infants and young children with disabilities?
3. Have you met with the state director of special education to discuss current efforts to
monitor a child's right to assistive technology at a local school level?
4. Have you met with your state director of vocational rehabilitation services to discuss
planning and implementation efforts to expand technology services and devices access to those
receiving VR services?
5. Have you met with your state coordinator of independent living services to discuss
expanded access to assistive technology?
6. Have you met with your state coordinator of supported employment services to discuss
improved access to assistive technology?
7. Have you met with the state director of Medical Assistance or their appropriate
representative to discuss Medicaid coverage of augmentative communication, powered mobility
and other types of technology assistance?
8. Have you met with your state director of the Office of Aging to discuss access to
assistive technology?
9. Have you met with your state protection and advocacy agency (P&A;) to discuss their
active involvement in right to assistive technology cases?
10. Have you met with your state director of the Client Assistance Program (CAP) to discuss
their involvement in eligibility and access to technology appeal cases?
11. Have you reserved a minimum of 10 percent of your budget for system change activities
that focus on improved funding for assistive technology?
A Tester's Strategy
A second proven strategy to determine ease of funding access statewide is to use individuals
with disabilities and parents of children with disabilities to "test the funding waters." A tester
is a potential or current technology user with a disability. Tech Act systems change projects can
identify individuals who would be willing to serve as testers of the funding system with the
assistance of nonprofit organizations such as Easter Seal, United Cerebral Palsy, Independent
Living Centers, Parent to Parent groups and others.
Care should be given to identify individuals broadly representative of the disability/assistive
technology constituency in your states: parents of preschool and school age youngsters
with disabilities, adults with disabilities, and senior citizens. Once this is done, each tester should
make an appointment with a funding stream administrator to ask such questions as:
The tester records the answers and sends in notes from the meeting to the systems change
project. The project would then analyze these reports to assess where breakdowns in the process
occurred and what steps need to take place in order to secure meaningful access to assistive
technology by all those entitled to it. As with all other similar activities, individuals with
disabilities and parents of children with disabilities who serve as testers should be compensated
for their time and any related expenses.
The A.T. Quarterly was a newsletter developed by the RESNA TA
Project under a contract with the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research
(NIDRR), U.S. Department of Education (ED). The content, however, does not necessarily reflect
the position or policy of NIDRR/ED and no official endorsement of the material should be
inferred.
___________________________ Name of lead agency
___________________________ Name of state director