This article is reprinted from the A.T. Quarterly, Volume 4, Number 1(1993)
"Our task is to think and act anew." - Abraham Lincoln.
Much of this issue of the A.T. Quarterly is devoted to a discussion and exploration
of the recently reauthorized Rehabilitation Act of 1973. While far from perfect, the
newly reauthorized law represents a clear break from many past practices and requires state
vocational rehabilitation (VR) agencies to practice the kind of thinking and acting anew that
Lincoln would have admired. The newly revamped law is premised on the following five simple
but critical principles that:
It is this fifth principle, of course, that is meant to transform the way state V.R. agencies
operate in our country. Up to now, an individual with a significant disability could be and often
was found or presumed to be unemployable and, thus, ineligible for V.R. services solely on the
basis of the severity of his/her disability.
Now, this assumption has taken a 180 degree nose dive and has been stood on its head. For
now the law tells people with disabilities and rehabilitation professionals alike, don't focus on
the severity of the disability. Don't focus on the problem. Focus instead on the solutions.
Focus on getting people the tools that they need: Assistive technology, personal assistance,
literacy training, job supports and other reasonable accommodations, not just to get and stay
employed but to pursue careers of their own choosing and design as well.
Right now individuals with disabilities who have needed access to personal assistance,
assistive technology and other essential job supports, are relatively few and far between. We are
more the exception than we are the rule. Our task in the next few years is not to try to come
up with a dozen or so more exceptions but rather, it is to change the rules of the game entirely!
That's the intent behind the reauthorized Rehabilitation Act Of 1973. But a law's intent
is only as good as we make it.
The A.T. Quarterly was a newsletter developed by the RESNA TA
Project under a contract with the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research
(NIDRR), U.S. Department of Education (ED). The content, however, does not necessarily reflect
the position or policy of NIDRR/ED and no official endorsement of the material should be
inferred.